True Partners Insights

Pillar Icon

GILTI High Taxed Income Exception: Are You ALL IN?

By: David Flores |

Prepared by: David Flores, Senior Manager and Expert Poker Player

The addition of a new tax on Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (“GILTI”) in the TCJA dealt taxpayers a new hand, with both opportunities and The Government released Final and Proposed regulations dealing with the GILTI High Taxed Exception (the “HTE”) in late June of 2019.  The GILTI HTE can provide a generous benefit because taxpayers would be able to remove GILTI CFCs from their calculation of GILTI, and therefore lower their GILTI inclusion. The Proposed Regulations expand the scope of this exception, thereby providing further relief to taxpayers as the exception becomes more broadly applicable.  This True Alert discusses the statutory framework, the Final Regulations’ treatment of the HTE, and how taxpayers should analyze the Proposed Regulation when making the GILTI HTE.

The Flop (Statutory Framework)

New Code § 951A, GILTI, introduced as a new regime to tax intangible income that was not captured under the Subpart F regime.

Similar to the HTE contained in Subpart F, the GILTI HTE would give some taxpayers the ability to reduce their GILTI inclusion by excluding tested income items for Controlled Foreign Corporations (“CFCs”) that have an effective tax rate above 18.9% (90% of the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate of 21%).  951A(c)(2)(A)(i)(III) provides that the HTE described in § 954(b)(4) includes GILTI along with Subpart F HTE (substituting “tested income” for “Subpart F income”).  Since Subpart F has laid much of the framework for how GILTI gets included for inclusion purposes, it is not a surprise that GILTI and Subpart F would share the same deck in tax law when it comes to the HTE.

The River Card (Final and Proposed Regulations)

Under the Final Regulations, foreign base company income and insurance income are the only types of income excluded as part of the GILTI HTE.  As a result, GILTI could tax other high-tax income such as active business income or financing income. The Proposed Regulations expand the scope of income sources to elect to exclude all high-taxed income, not only foreign base company income or insurance income.  Although GILTI may share the same deck in §954(b)(4), there are differences that do make the GILTI HTE a different card in the same suit.  Taxpayers should know and understand these differences when looking to apply the GILTI HTE.

A Different Card in the Same Suit

There are both potential benefits and drawbacks of making the HTE provided by the Proposed Regulations, the below factors should be considered in making the decision:

Pros (hit me with another card):

  • Taxpayers can exclude tested items for CFCs with tax rates above 18.9% and lower their GILTI inclusion.
  • The GILTI HTE election is made annually, so you aren’t stuck with it forever if you decide to make it in one year.

Cons (fold):

  • Even though the election can be revoked, there are consequences stacked against you. If the election is revoked, there is a waiting period of 60 months (5 years) before the election can be made again.  That is a long time to wait to get this potential benefit.
  • This is an “all or nothing” election applied to all CFCs in the consolidated group. The application of the election would be for all CFCs that are above the given high taxed rate of 18.9%.  As a result, a downside of the GILTI HTE election is that a HTE CFC that had high-tax foreign tax credits (“FTCs) previously netted against GILTI liability would be excluded from the consolidated calculation of GILTI liability, resulting in a higher net GILTI liability.

All In

While the election in the Proposed Regulation is not currently available and will probably not be retroactive, taxpayers should be analyzing the impact that making this election will have on their tax position, should the proposed election (or something similar) be adopted by future Final Regulations. There are several steps to this analysis that cannot be missed to be able to claim the election; below are important steps that should be followed when doing the calculation.

  • Prepare gross income separately for each (“Qualified Business Unit”) to assess Gross Tested Income items on a separate basis (i.e. on an income by income basis),
  • Allocate and apportion the QBU deductions to get Net Tested Income items,
  • Allocate taxes based on the complementing foreign tax credit basket methodology,
  • Calculate the Effective Tax Rate (“ETR”) for each Net Tested Income item by QBU;
  • Exclude CFCs that are above an 18.9% effective tax rate.
  • Compare group taxable income with and without the election.


As mentioned, the election in the Proposed Regulations cannot be applied to provision and tax returns currently.  Nevertheless, some taxpayers are already including the GILTI HTE election in their current GILTI modeling exercises.  Below are a list of some potential questions that have been asked by taxpayers while we wait to hear about the Proposed Regulation being Final?

  • Is the HTE retroactive to apply to the first GILTI inclusion year in the 2018 Tax Return?
  • Will an all-or-nothing approach be revised so that the election can be made CFC by CFC?
  • Can the HTE put me in worse answer in GILTI?

True Partners Consulting (“TPC”) can help taxpayers model the potential application of the HTE election contained in the Proposed Regulations, as well as variations raised by taxpayers and commentators.  In particular, we can help model the impact of a retroactive application of the election as well as results if the Final election allows the election on a CFC-by-CFC basis (as opposed to the all-or-nothing approach).  Starting a conversation now with TPC can help taxpayers better understand how the GILTI HTE election will impact them by walking through the application of the proposed election and possible alternatives.  Additionally, the Government is still accepting comments on the Proposed Regulations and we can provide a platform for you to express your thoughts on these proposed rules anonymously.  Much remains to be seen as we wait to hear if the Proposed Regulation will be Final and taxpayers can apply these expanded rules.  You’ve got to be “IN IT” to “WIN IT”!